admin, Author at California Consumer Attorneys, P.C.

Recalls and Lawsuits – Ford’s 360 Degree Camera Problems

Posted on October 19, 2023

Owners are unhappy with an otherwise extremely useful feature on Ford and Lincoln models.

Despite being recalled, Ford has not fixed the problem with 360-degree cameras according to several owners who filed class action lawsuits against the US car maker.

What are the Symptoms of the Faulty 360-degree camera?

The backup camera screen shows nothing, appearing black or blue, with the 360-degree camera experiencing glitches.

These affect the following models:

2020-2023 Ford Explorer
2020-2023 Lincoln Aviator
2020-2023 Lincoln Corsair

History of the Recall and Lawsuit

The class action claims Ford knew about the issues and has done so since February 2021. This is after there have been more than 3,400 warranty claims for 360-degree cameras since April 2018 and August this year, even causing two crashes.

The vehicles affected were recalled by Ford, as per usual procedure, and fixed in September 2021 and again in January 2023 after a further 17 collisions. The third claim followed a few months later after 422,000 models were affected, including the Ford Explorer, Lincoln Aviator, and Lincoln Corsair. Finally, in September 2023 the fourth and final claim to date included Lincoln Aviator, Lincoln Navigator, Ford Transit, and Ford Bronco vehicles all having faulty 360-degree cameras.

What Ford Claim is the Issue with 360 Degree Camera

Ford claims, in the most recent recall, that the 360-degree cameras had image processing module software issues. Ford also claims the 360-degree camera screens may turn black or blue due to poor wiring retention and the camera’s hardware.

Experiencing Camera Problems? How You Can Take Back Control

Due to the recall claims in this case, many owners are facing the same issue with their 360-degree cameras. While many repairs and fixes have been initiated, owners continue to be unhappy with the solutions provided by Ford. These problems have the potential to escalate into further legal action, underlining the importance of protecting consumer rights.

If you struggle with vehicle troubles and feel cornered against big vehicle brands, remember it is always better to have experts with you. With extensive experience and successful cases at hand, The Lemon Firm is your best bet. With the dedicated team members always at your disposal, the package becomes too good to be true. So, if your car is giving you a headache, don’t hesitate to reach out!

Call 833 Lemon Firm and speak with a case analyst today!

Lawsuit Action Against Ford Fuel Pumps Failing

Posted on October 18, 2023

Bosch fuel pumps allegedly caused Ford Power Stroke diesel engines to fail, leaving owners in despair and filing a class action lawsuit.

After numerous recalls and issues with Ford’s big trucks, the latest claim involves a design flaw in the Bosch-made pump and the formula of US diesel, causing one owner over $12,000 in repairs.

History of the Fuel Pump Defect

The Bosch CP4 fuel pump fitted in 2011-present 6.7L Power Stroke Diesel engines amongst Ford trucks contain metal parts that rub against each other. This rubbing causes friction and shaves off metal filings that feed through the fuel systems causing havoc.

The cause of the friction is apparently due to the US diesel used in these engines. The construction of US diesel means that it has no lubrication properties. Unlike diesel manufactured for other regions, US diesel causes the breakdown of the fuel pump internals.
Why the fuel pump lawsuit was filed.

David Clark, the owner of a 2020 F-350 claimed his 6.7L Power Stroke unit failed and entered limp mode after only 23,000 miles and within the first year of ownership. The unit then stalled and failed to start. This resulted in David taking his truck to a Ford dealership, where the failing fuel pump was detected.

Ford allegedly mistakenly denied David coverage of this under warranty which meant he was $12,838 out of pocket. Along with the towing costs, David was losing income every hour the vehicle was off the road.

Do you Have a Faulty Vehicle? Take Back Control

There could be many Ford owners facing the same issue with their Bosch fuel pump. Many owners like David continue to be unhappy with the solutions provided by automakers. These problems have the potential to escalate into further legal action, underlining the importance of protecting consumer rights.

Call 833 Lemon Firm and speak with a case analyst today!

2021–2023 Ram Truck Models Recalled Over a Rearview Camera Issue

Posted on October 17, 2023

Ram trucks have seen a considerable number of recalls over the past few years based on electrical system problems, faulty fuel pumps, and airbag inflators. Two more recalls were issued in June 2022 by Stellantis concerning the backup camera problem. The defect is in the trailer reverse steering control module (TRSCM), resulting in a blank camera display while reversing the car. The inability of a backup camera to display images could lead to a crash.

Details of the Recall

The Ram truck backup camera recall involves approximately 337,000 vehicles. There are two recalls regarding the backup camera issue: the first recall was in November 2021, which states that the defect prevents the camera from forming a rearview image under certain conditions. The camera fails to form an image due to software in the R1 high radio of the Ram truck.

In the second recall, the issue is in the trailer steering system, which is meant to help the driver during backing up when the trailer is attached. Some vehicle owners notice a warning light showing in connection with the vehicle’s electric throttle control situated just behind the steering wheel. The following Ram truck models are included in the recall:

Ram 1500 pickup trucks launched between the 25^th of June 2021 and 2^nd of August 2023.
Ram 2500 pickup trucks launched between the 7^th of August 2021 and the 27^th of August 2023.
Ram 3500 cab chassis trucks launched between the 10^th of December 2021 and the 27^th of June 2023.

How to Fix the Issue?

The Ram dealerships will mail the recall letter on the 17^th of November, 2023, to the owners of all recalled vehicles. The dealers will inspect the issue and resolve it without charging any money to the owners. Stellantis is bound to repay all the expenses spent already for fixing the issue by the owners of the Ram trucks that are included in the recall. Moreover, the company will also cover the losses and repairs related to the issue.

How to Check Your Vehicle for Recall?

You will receive the notice from Stellantis via mail, which states the problem and instructions the owner should follow to get the solution. If you don’t receive the email and are unsure whether your vehicle is included in the recall, contact Ram customer service at (800) 853-1403. The LLC number for this recall is 97A, and the NHTSA number is 23V654.

Enter your 17-digit VIN into the NHTSA website. If your truck appears, it means it is included in the recall. On the other hand, if your truck doesn’t appear, it means it is currently not included in the recall. As several recalls are initiated simultaneously, it is recommended to check regularly on the website for an update.

Bottom Line

The Ram trucks involved in this recall have an issue with the backup camera that is associated with the radio software. The display image is not formed, which makes it difficult for the driver to reverse the truck. This put the truck at risk of hitting walls, poles, other vehicles, and even people.

If you find yourself grappling with Any uncertainties relating to your Dodge truck, call (833) Lemon-Firm for legal assistance. Your legal matter is in expert hands. Our experienced attorneys can help you successfully resolve these problems and recover compensation.

Class Action Alert: Ford’s Defective CP4 Fuel Pumps

Posted on October 16, 2023

Ford trucks equipped with the 6.7L Power Stroke diesel engine are making headlines. As an owner of a Ford vehicle, you may already be aware of the ongoing situation. The root cause of the problem lies with the CP4 fuel pumps, which have been reported since 2011. This has led owners to face costly repairs, engine failures, and financial distress. However, there is still hope for resolution through a legal battle. The class action lawsuit filed against these issues could provide relief for you. Let’s explore this in detail!

Defective CP4 Fuel Pumps

The primary issue concerning CP4 fuel pumps in 2011-present Ford diesel trucks is the presence of metal components that experience friction, leading to the production of damaging metal shavings. These shavings disrupt not only the fuel system but also the engine, an expensive repair if post warranty. For instance, a Texas plaintiff, David Clark, had to pay about $10,000 to repair his vehicle’s engine. After Clark discovered the CP4 pump was indeed the issue, Ford denied his warranty claim for the engine and related costs. This was very concerning to other owners, too.

Owners’ Journey to Justice

Another problem the owners face is the type of diesel fuel used in the USA. The fuel doesn’t provide the required lubrication to CP4 pumps. This results in further complications, as critical components such as the cam and rollers gradually deteriorate. The “Ford Super Duty” has been subjected to various lawsuits due to such issues. Some pickup trucks had troubles, like roof crush and the “death wobble.” Also, its power tailgates didn’t work, and there were problems with its diesel emissions. Owners have joined forces to address these problems through legal means by initiating a class-action lawsuit.

Signs to Look For

Here are some common signs to be mindful of when it comes to detecting issues with CP4 fuel pumps:

Notice any abnormal sounds from the engine that you didn’t hear before.
If your truck experiences reduced power and no longer performs at its previous level.
Watch out for hard starting, rough idle, and loss of power.
Beware of fuel leaks, low fuel pressure, and metal particles in the fuel system.
Pay attention to warning lights or messages on your dashboard.

Lawsuit Claims

In the lawsuit, it is asserted that the pump’s design mandates a cam and two pumping cylinders, each featuring its own rollers. The expectation is that these elements should seamlessly operate without interruptions, shifting, or adhering. Also, the diesel fuel in the United States lacks sufficient lubrication, resulting in rapid wear and tear of the cam and rollers. This, in turn, leads to the generation of additional metal shavings. The class action lawsuit asserts that an engine replacement is ineffective due to the detrimental impact of U.S. diesel fuel, which can lead to the deterioration of a newly installed engine.

Legal Roadmap for Owners

Now, you know everything about the highlighted issue with your Ford Super Duty CP4 fuel pumps. It’s time to keep a keen check on your engine’s performance by watching out for the abovementioned signs.

If you’re facing such issues, seek expert assistance from Lemon Firm. We’ll provide you with a clear legal strategy. Lemon Firm specializes in cases like yours and has a well-established history of success. Our mission is to safeguard your rights and guide you toward a just resolution.

For professional support with your claim, contact one of our case analysts today at 833-lemonfirm.

Lucid Motors and Rivian Owners Face Technical Glitches With Their New EV’s

Posted on August 10, 2023

With the soaring popularity of electric vehicles, challenges come hand in hand. Lucid Motors and Rivian EV owners have recently been experiencing a range of vehicle-related issues. But despite these setbacks, many consumers are still satisfied. The reports of challenges faced by various people provide insight into the transitional phase; these startups are passing through. The promise of a greener future and sustainable transportation seems to outweigh the obstacles along the way.

Lucid Motors Troubles

According to the complaints filed on the NHTSA website and other online forums, the electric vehicle (EV) startup, Lucid Motors, faced some issues with Lucid Air. Owners have experienced gear shifting issues, seat movement malfunctions, loss of motive power, drive system faults, charging glitches, and range issues. Complaints include instances of vehicles moving in the opposite direction of the selected gear and seats moving unexpectedly.

Recently, a San Diego-based Lucid Air owner encountered a gear-shifting problem. Lucid Motors must refine its electric vehicles. Seat movement malfunctions cause inconvenience to the drivers and pose potential dangers. Loss of motive power and drive system faults lead to unexpected breakdowns. While charging glitches and range issues limit the vehicle’s usability.

The Lucid EVs warranty covers the following components:

Basic Vehicle: 48 Months/50,000 miles
Powertrain: 96 Months/100,000 miles
High-voltage battery: 96 Months /100,000 miles to 70% capacity
Corrosion protection: 120 Months/unlimited mileage
Body and paint defects: 48 Months/unlimited mileage
Supplemental Restraint System: 60 Months/60,000 miles

Rivian Challenges

Rivian, the EV Company backed by Ford, has garnered positive attention as it has a high number of satisfied buyers. However, owners have reported a few challenges with their vehicles. These issues include unexpected movement of Rivian RIT trucks while in the “parked” position on a downhill slope, sudden stops in traffic, quality problems with the roof glass, rattling passenger seats due to missing bolts, and a “vampire” battery drain problem. However, consumers have practiced brand loyalty. Rivian must resolve these issues to maintain customer satisfaction and provide a first-class driving experience.

Comparing to Tesla’s Journey

Lucid Motors and Rivian, two promising electric vehicle startups, are currently facing reported issues with their respective models:

Lucid Air
Rivian R1T trucks
Rivians R1S SUV

These challenges are reminiscent of the time when Tesla encountered similar challenges. Tesla resolved such issues over time. To establish themselves in the market, Lucid Motors and Rivian must address and resolve these issues properly.

Bottom Line

Lucid Motors and Rivian, two prominent electric vehicle startups, have recently faced reported issues with their vehicles. Lucid Air owners encountered several problems. Similarly, Rivian owners have experienced unexpected movement in the “parked position,” rattling seats, and battery drain problems. These conundrums raise concerns about the long-term success of the companies.

Don’t navigate hybrid or EV complexities alone! When safeguarding your reimbursements for manufacturing faults, partner with expert attorneys with a proven record of victories. Join forces with the Lemon Firm; dial (833) Lemon-Firm to chat with a skilled case analyst today!

Engine Stalling Forces GM to Recall Chevy Equinox & Terrain

Posted on May 23, 2023

General Motors has announced a recall for certain models of Chevy Equinox recently. The recall is due to a fuel pump flow issue that could cause the engine to stall, increasing the risk of an accident. To ensure your safety, it’s crucial for Equinox owners to determine if their vehicle is subject to a recall and take necessary measures.

A Brief Overview

The recall covers models from 2021 to 2022 having contamination in the fuel pump that can restrict its flow, leading to stalling or failure. The issue can cause safety hazards for drivers and passengers. Therefore, it is essential for Chevy Equinox owners to learn and understand the details of the recall. Moreover, the GMC Terrain 2022 model is also being recalled as it is affected by the same issue with its engine. The recall involves replacing the affected fuel pumps to ensure the safety of the vehicle.

Which Vehicles Are Affected by the Recall?

The recall affected more than 23,000 vehicles. So, make sure your vehicle is not at risk for any potential fuel pump-related issues. GM has stated that the issue will be fixed free of cost by replacing the fuel pump module. The company will make sure that the vehicles meet safety standards.

The following vehicle models are affected by the recall:

Chevy Equinox 2021
Chevy Equinox 2022
GMC Terrain 2022

Possible Implications Arising from Fuel Pump Flow Issue

The recall of Chevy Equinox due to an inadequate fuel pump flow issue raises concerns about the potential consequences of such a problem. One of the major consequences of this issue is the risk of engine stalling. It may cause accidents. Furthermore, the problem can lead to an engine misfire. As a result, it can decrease power and acceleration. Fuel pump flow issues can also cause fuel pressure to drop. Ultimately, it will affect the proper functioning of the fuel injection system. In addition, prolonged driving with an inadequate fuel pump flow can cause internal engine damage.

How to Assess If Your Vehicle Is Affected?

It’s crucial to stay informed about any potential issues with your vehicle. To assess whether your vehicle is affected, check the VIN on NHTSA official site and cross-reference it with the recall list. Additionally, if you experience difficulty starting or reduced performance, take it to the mechanic for inspection. Remember that it’s better to be proactive and address issues in time.

Bottom Line

In conclusion, the recall due to engine stalling is a serious issue that shouldn’t be taken lightly. The safety of people should always be a priority for manufacturers. Customers with vehicles affected should contact their local dealerships immediately for a free repair. Car owners must stay informed about recalls and take immediate action if they suspect any vehicle issues.

We at Lemon Firm specialize in suing automakers for selling vehicles with manufacturer defects. If you have faced similar issues with your hybrid or EV, contact us at (833) Lemon-firm. Our expert attorneys will help you recover the compensation you deserve.

Audi A8, S8, and Q4 e-tron Airbag Folding Issues Lead to a Recall

Posted on April 12, 2023

Audi is known for its luxury vehicles and SUVs. Having a history of about 100 years with its elegant and innovative models and unique features, Audi is a brand of class and splendor. However, three of the models of this Ingolstadt-based company are facing a recall upon critical safety concerns of folding and tearing of airbags. Read the article for more details!

Recall Details from the Company

During the safety tests of the Audi Q4 e-Tron, the manufacturers came across a serious safety issue. The curtain airbag of that model was damaged and torn apart in the conformity tests. A similar type of defect was found in Audi A8 and S8. The inability of these vehicles to properly fold their airbags during the test drives forced the company to issue a recall. These recalls were issued through NHTSA and asked the dealerships to take proper measures.

Problems Reported After the Test

The following issues were detected by the test engineers in A8, S8, and Q4 e-Tron models:

During deployment, the door seal of the Q4 model might become distorted, releasing the metallic inlay within the seal and tearing up the airbag.
In addition to safety risk, this airbag problem is against the ejection mitigation’s safety standard #226.
A8 and S8 models by Audi car manufacturers have airbag folding faults, which again have serious consequences during accidents and car crashes.
The impact of incorrect airbag folding is serious for children and short people as the possible force of inflating airbags imposes greater injury threats.

Number of Units Recalled By Audi Manufacturers

Audi automakers have confirmed that they are unaware of any complaints, claims, or accident reports regarding airbag faults in the aforementioned models. For safety concerns, the company has recalled more than four thousand units of Q4 e-Tron manufactured between 2022 and 2023. If we talk about the A8 model, 692 units manufactured from May 3, 2022, to December 7, 2022, are subject to recall.

After detecting the S8 airbag problem, 355 units (2022) were given recall. A statement issued by Audi denotes that all the models produced after December 7, 2022, are damage-free and meet all the safety standards.

Measures Were Taken By Automakers to Mitigate the Problem

After all the tests and problem identifications, Audi makers have given relief to their customers. In the Q4 e-Tron, the company has decided to install cloth tape in the B-pillar areas of the front seats to keep the door seal intact. You can contact the closest dealership and ask for the repair. For A8 and S8 models, the company ordered the dealership to replace the airbag modules of the front passenger seats.

Bottom Line

Airbags are the major life savers in every car crash. The problem in such a critical part is a major setback in luxury vehicles. If you are the owner of any of the above-mentioned car models and facing the problem, you can contact the expert attorneys of Lemon firm.

Call (833)Lemon-firm and seek solutions from a Lemon Law expert today.

GM Faces $100M Penalty for Engine Defects in Class Action Lawsuit

Posted on April 3, 2023

General Motors was handed a $100 million verdict as a result of a lawsuit filed over its engine defect. The legal action claimed that some GM vehicles were equipped with defective engine components that caused excessive oil consumption, leading to engine damage and failure. The plaintiffs argued that GM knew about the defect but didn’t disclose it. This verdict could have significant implications for GM and the auto industry.

Background of the Engine Defect Issue

The issue was discovered in 2014 when customers reported problems with their engines, including sudden loss of power and stalling. Initially, they believed the problem was with the ignition switch, but further investigation found that it was due to a flaw in the engine’s oil consumption system. It caused the engines to consume oil, leading to engine damage and failure.

The affected vehicles include:

GMC Sierra
Chevrolet Avalanche
Silverado
Suburban
Yukon and Yukon XL and
Tahoe

Class-Action Lawsuit against GM

The lawsuit accused GM of using faulty engine parts in certain vehicles sold from 2011 to 2014, causing early engine failure. GM knew about these issues but didn’t tell customers. It was brought by thousands of affected customers seeking compensation for repair costs, diminished vehicle value, and other expenses. The jury found GM guilty and ordered them to pay $100 million. It is a setback for GM, which has had many legal problems related to vehicle defects.

Implications of the Verdict

The verdict has significant implications for both GM and the plaintiffs involved in the lawsuit. For GM, the verdict may serve as a warning to prioritize quality control and avoid similar defects in the future. The automaker may also need to allocate resources towards compensating affected customers and repairing faulty engines. On the other hand, the plaintiffs may receive compensation for their damages, including costs associated with repairs, lost wages, and other related expenses. The verdict may also impact ongoing lawsuits against GM, particularly those related to the company’s ignition switch defect, linked to several deaths and injuries.

The $100M Settlement

GM must pay $100 million as part of the settlement for a class-action lawsuit regarding an engine defect. The lawsuit alleged that GM knowingly sold vehicles with defective engines that caused the cars to stall or experience a sudden power loss. The settlement was reached after a jury trial in a federal court where the plaintiffs argued that the defect caused safety hazards and reduced the value of the affected vehicles. Despite GM denying wrongdoing, the settlement includes compensation for repairs or losses incurred due to the defect and provisions for additional repair and extended warranties.

Bottom Line

To sum up, General Motors (GM) has to pay $100 million for engine defects that caused engine failures and fires in certain vehicles, risking consumer safety and harming the company’s reputation and finances. This incident highlights the importance of ensuring product safety and quality control before market release. Swift action to rectify defects is necessary to protect consumers and brand trust. The penalty also shows how class action lawsuits hold companies accountable and compensate affected consumers seeking justice for damages caused by faulty products.

Lemon Law firm helps people recover compensation who were sold vehicles with manufacturing defects. If you’re experiencing issues with your vehicle, call (833) Lemon-firm to speak with our expert attorneys.

Source: Jewett, A. (2023) Drivers fight back against GM’s challenge to $100M engine defect verdict, Top Class Actions. Available at: https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/general-motors-class-action-lawsuit-and-settlement-news/gm-receives-100m-verdict-in-engine-defect-class-action/ (Accessed: March 30, 2023).

Class Action Against GM For Defective Transmission | Gear up for Justice

Posted on March 24, 2023

General Motors (GM) has settled a class action lawsuit for selling vehicles with defective 8-speed automatic transmissions. It is reported that GM sold over 800,000 vehicles with these faulty transmissions without disclosing the issue to customers prior to purchase. Consequently, the class action settled in 26 states as the automaker sold defective transmission vehicles and allowed them to operate on public roads, endangering drivers, passengers, and pedestrians.

Lawsuit Charges

The lawsuit particularly relates to vehicles equipped with GM’s 8L90 or 8L45 transmissions, manufactured between 2015 and March 1, 2019. The lawsuit asserts that General Motors made a deliberate business decision to withhold information from customers about the transmissions’ subpar performance, despite being aware of the issue. This conduct is believed to be a violation of state consumer protection laws. The lawsuit seeks reimbursement for any expenses associated with repairs incurred due to the defective transmission and to hold General Motors accountable for not informing customers transparently and promptly.

Consequences on Buyers

Defective vehicles can cause several negative consequences for buyers, such as experiencing hesitation, lurching, and lunging while accelerating or decelerating their vehicles. Additionally, they may also undergo shaking or “shudder” when driving at high speeds, which can be potentially dangerous. If the transmission fails or malfunctions, the vehicle can become inoperable, leaving the driver stranded and creating a hazardous situation. In severe cases, a malfunctioning transmission can even lead to accidents, causing injuries or fatalities. Additionally, defective transmission can also pose a risk of transmission fluid leaks, which can cause damage to other parts of the vehicle. On the flip side, repairing a faulty transmission carry the possibility of unexpected expenses, including the cost of replacement parts and labor fees. Furthermore, it can significantly decrease the value of the vehicle, causing financial losses for the owner and making it challenging to recoup the investment.

Affected Vehicle Models

The following vehicle models are part of a lawsuit against General Motors alleging faulty eight-speed automatic transmissions:

2016/19 Chevrolet Corvette
2015/19 Chevrolet Colorado
2015/19 Chevrolet Camaro
2017/19 Chevrolet Silverado
2016/19 Cadillac Escalade and Escalade ESV
GMC Sierra, Yukon, Yukon XL, and Yukon Denali XL
2015/19 Cadillac ATS, ATS-V, CTS, CT6, and CTS-V
2017/19 GMC Canyon

How Should Owners Respond?

Since at least 2015, General Motors has been dealing with shifting issues in their 8-speed automatic transmissions. So far, the company has released 13 versions of a technical service bulletin related to the issue and has replaced the automatic transmission fluid in MY19 to MY22 vehicles with harsh shifts. In response to the current lawsuit surrounding defective transmissions, it is imperative for owners delivered with faulty transmissions to take certain steps to protect themselves.

The second action against GM, Battle v. General Motors, LLC, 2:22-CV-108783, is also in process regarding vehicles with 8L transmissions. Therefore, owners, especially those who have experienced transmission issues, need to comprehend their rights and available courses of action. It is advisable for them to consult with a legal professional to explore probable solutions. Alternatively, owners may consider taking their vehicle to an authorized dealership for repairs, as these repairs may be covered under a warranty or a recall.

Bottom Line

Your safety and well-being are top priorities, don’t ignore any signs of hesitation, shaking, or other issues. Taking proactive measures is essential to ensure you drive a reliable and safe vehicle. Moreover, joining the recent lawsuit as a plaintiff can help car owners pursue compensation for any damages or losses they have suffered due to the defective transmission. Stay informed and take the necessary steps to ensure your vehicle operates smoothly and safely.

Trust Our Expert Team!

At The Lemon Firm, our team of skilled attorneys specializes in guiding clients through the process with personalized attention and effective legal strategies. If you have suffered losses, injuries, or damages, call us today at 833-LEMON FIRM to speak with our experts and see how we can help you.

Ford Lawsuit: Ford Fiesta and Focus Owners Face Issues with Powershift Transmission

Posted on March 20, 2023

The owners of the Ford Fiesta (2017-2019) and Ford Focus (2017-2018) models sued the company for failing to provide their promised PowerShift Transmission. This was supposed to be a more effective way of transmission, unlike other cars that contain a manual or automatic transmission. However, this DPS6 dual-clutch transmission caused drivers to have delayed braking, acceleration problems, and overall vehicle jerking while driving. Overall, there are more than 380,000 cars with this type of transmission.

Old Lawsuit

This is not the first time that people have had this same issue. Back in 2012, owners sued Ford for Powershift transmission defects in their:

Ford Fiesta (2011-2016)
Ford Focus (2012-2016)

This lawsuit was settled in 2020. As a result, Ford offered discount certificates for purchasing a new car. If the owners wished to have their old cars, the dealers also offered a clutch repair procedure. People thought that was when the issue would stop occurring, but unfortunately, that wasn’t the case.

Effects of This Defect

The DPS6 Transmission has faults in its manufacturing that causes knee-jerk movements while driving, which can cause many accidents. Along with that, the sudden acceleration and slowing down of the car are harmful not only to the passengers but also to the vehicles around them! The lawsuit also mentioned how these dry clutches could overheat and damage surrounding car parts. Some of these car owners mentioned how the car would shake non-stop and stall during traffic.

Ford Motor Company’s Response to the Lawsuit

After seeing how alarming the damages of the defect were, Ford took serious action against this lawsuit. As mentioned before, they offered repair services and discount certificates. But, an investigation was conducted known as “Out of Gear,” in which it was discovered that Ford already knew about the failed transmission before the vehicles were sold. This caused a lot of outrage among the people as they spent hundreds of dollars trying to fix this transmission defect.

Solutions for Such Vehicle Owners

Ford dealers informed the press about how there is no solution or fix for the DPS6 Transmission problem. This means that even if you spend your money trying to repair the clutches, it will cause the same issues over and over again. The root cause of the defect is the manufacturing, which is only controlled by Ford. So sadly, there is no repair for this. However, you can still contact your nearest Ford Motor dealership and ask them about the discount certificates to purchase a new car.

When you buy your next car, make sure to inspect it thoroughly and see if it has the same DPS6 Powershift transmission. It is best to avoid this type of transmission and instead go for your standard transmissions like manual or automatic.

Bottom Line

It is safe to say that Ford has made a huge blunder again by launching vehicles that they were previously sued for. As of now, the status conference is scheduled to be on 5^th May 2023. Following that, the Final Pretrial Conference will be on 11^th August 2023. Just a few days later, on 29^th August, the Jury Trial will take place.

If you are facing similar issues with your vehicles, you can contact us at the Lemon firm at 833-536-6634. Our lawyers have won many cases against automakers and brought justice to our clients. So, call us to speak with a Lemon Firm expert today!