Jeep Class Action Lawsuit Claims Wrangler Unlimited 4xe Battery Defect – All You Need to Know

A recent class-action lawsuit claiming Jeep Wrangler vehicles may have a serious battery defect.

History Behind the Class Action

Thomas Teger through California federal court has filed a class action lawsuit after the US-manufactured Jeep Wrangler hybrid has a defective battery system. The design of the battery makes it “unreasonably dangerous” and a safety risk outlined in the 114-page document. This is after claims of danger to the plaintiff’s health, endangering him and other vehicle occupants.

The plaintiff was chosen to represent a California subclass and nationwide class action for anyone current or a former owner of the affected model and model years. This encompasses current or previous lessees too.

Last November, FCA issued instructions on parking away from structures after a fire risk from affected Jeep Wrangler 4xe battery faults. Teger also claims in the class action that owners have not been given a fix or any form of solution to this defect since the announcement.

The lawsuit also claims that the conglomerate automaker breaches the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, California’s Unfair Business Practices Act, and Song-Beverly Act for providing vehicles not in good faith or fair dealing.

Plaintiffs’ counsel  is also asking for a jury trial and seeks an injunction, along with various types of damages—actual, general, special, incidental, statutory, compensatory, and consequential—for himself and all members of the class.

Which Models Are Affected?

If you drive or have owned or leased a 2021-2023 Jeep Wrangler 4xe Plug-In Hybrid, your model may be affected. This lawsuit follows a similar class action earlier this year after the same 4xe Plug-In Hybrid had claims of a faulty propulsion system that may cause fires and vehicle explosions.

What Owners Need to Do Next

Those who are interested can follow the lawsuit filed under Teger, et al. v. FCA US, LLC, Case No. 2:24-cv-04570, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. 

Whilst FCA has not issued a fix for the claimed battery fault, they have instructed owners to continue to park a “safe” distance away from structures to avoid potential fire risks. 

How Jeep Owners Can Take Back Control

While owners have opened class actions, many continue to be unhappy with the solutions provided by automakers. These problems have the potential to escalate into further action, just like this – underlining the importance of protecting consumer rights.

If you struggle with vehicle troubles and feel cornered against big vehicle brands, remember it is always better to have experts with you. With extensive experience and successful cases at hand, The Lemon Firm is your best bet. With the dedicated team members always at your disposal, the package becomes too good to be true. So, if your car is giving you a headache, don’t hesitate to reach out! 

Call 833 Lemon Firm and speak with a case analyst today!

About the Author
Sepehr Daghighian is a partner with CCA that is well-versed in all aspects of lemon-law litigation. A 2005 graduate of Loyola Law School, Mr. Daghighian has been practicing litigation throughout the state of California for over 13-years. In this time, Mr. Daghighian has advocated on behalf of California consumers in hundreds of lemon law cases throughout our great state. Mr. Daghighian has also successfully tried numerous such cases to verdict in both Federal and State Court.